EDITORIAL NOTE:
This article is based on statements and records from Greenland’s government, corporate and SEC filings, company statements, and reporting by KNR, Danwatch, Reuters and The Guardian. There is no evidence Donald Trump directed, coordinated, or secretly backed the Greenland Energy project. Where political and business connections exist, they are identified as connections, not proof of coordination.
An American oil venture wants to explore for oil beneath Jameson Land in eastern Greenland. The people behind it believe there could be an enormous amount of money underground. They have investors, equipment, ambitious schedules, a television documentary in production, and enough confidence to talk publicly about drilling as though the biggest remaining problem is getting everything into position.
There’s just one recurring complication: Greenland keeps saying they don’t have permission yet.
Not permission to drill. Not current permission for some of the logistics needed to prepare for drilling. And, according to Greenland’s government, Greenland Energy itself doesn’t even hold the underlying exploration licenses the way it has sometimes suggested publicly.
You would think those details might slow down the swagger. Apparently not.
Your subscription helps fund reporting, research, publishing, new features, and the continued growth of every Tom Hicks Media publication.
The exploration rights in question are real. Greenland didn’t cancel every existing petroleum license when it stopped issuing new ones in 2021. These particular licenses date back years and remain alive. But they belong to White Flame Energy, a subsidiary of 80 Mile.
Greenland Energy has a contractual path to earn up to a 70% working interest by funding and completing the first two exploration wells. For now, White Flame holds 100% of the working interest, and any transfer of the license interests requires Greenlandic government consent.
That gives the Texas-based company plenty of economic skin in the game. It does not magically turn Greenland Energy into the license holder, and Greenland’s government has now gone out of its way to make that clear publicly.
That would be an unusually technical distinction if Greenland Energy hadn’t also spent months talking about the project with a level of certainty that keeps running into the people who actually issue the permissions.
The equipment moved. The permission hadn’t.
On July 30, equipment connected to the project was transported and unloaded at Nerlerit Inaat Airport in eastern Greenland.
This was not a drilling rig rolling into Jameson Land and punching a hole through the tundra. That distinction matters. The shipment included containers and logistical equipment being positioned ahead of the proposed exploration program.
The problem wasn’t what the equipment was doing. It was how it got there.
Greenland’s mineral authorities said the project did not have the required current approval for that logistical move. There had been a previous authorization for landing equipment in 2025, but weather prevented the operation from being completed as intended. That approval expired in December, and a new application was still being processed when the equipment was moved.
Greenland responded with what its government described as a strong warning and told the license holder that future logistical operations requiring approval would need to obtain it before they occurred.
It is difficult to make Greenland’s position much clearer without sending someone over to personally stand in front of the containers.
Then Roderick McIllree, who had taken a larger role in managing the Greenland side of the project, explained his reaction.
“I didn’t think it was a big deal.”
He argued that the equipment was being stored at a commercial airport while the permit process continued. Maybe it didn’t seem like a big deal from the company’s side, but Greenland apparently thought Greenland’s permission was a fairly big part of doing business in Greenland.
That is where this story stops being a fight about paperwork and starts becoming something much more interesting.
Because this keeps happening
At a June meeting with residents, Greenland Energy CEO Robert Price reportedly told people, “We have the permit to put the equipment on the land.”
Greenland’s mineral authorities had a different understanding. They said there were no active permissions at the time for the activity being discussed. Price later rejected the idea that there was a discrepancy. There certainly seems to have been one.
And it wasn’t confined to a town meeting.
In an amended SEC filing dated April 23, Greenland Energy told investors that Greenland “has approved” mobilization and sealift landing of heavy equipment for the project. Elsewhere in the same filing, it said March GL “has received authorization to mobilize equipment to the license area.”
What the filing does not mention is that Greenland now says its 2025 approval to land a smaller amount of equipment had expired in December, four months before that SEC filing.
That doesn’t automatically make the SEC filing false. We don’t know whether the company believed some other authorization supported its language, and we don’t have evidence showing otherwise.
But once Greenland’s government puts an expiration date on the authorization it says existed, that omission becomes pretty damn important.
This is the recurring pattern: the corporate version sounds like the project is advancing toward an expected outcome, while the Greenlandic version sounds like somebody needs to read the instructions before opening the box.
Greenland is not their house
Eventually, even people inside the project began acknowledging that the American side had created a problem.
Chairman Larry Swets conceded that enthusiasm around the venture had caused confusion in communications. Responsibility for permitting and government relations shifted more heavily toward the existing license-holder side of the partnership.
McIllree was considerably less diplomatic. Talking about the previous American leadership, he said:
“They did not understand that Greenland is not their house.”
There’s your sovereignty argument. I don’t need to invent one.
This is not Greenpeace describing an oil company. It isn’t an opposition politician trying to make Americans look arrogant. It is the man brought in to steady the project explaining what had gone wrong.
He also said the Americans needed to be reined in and made clear that Greenland’s rules had to be respected.
Which raises a fairly obvious question. How in the hell did anybody involved in an American oil exploration project in Greenland reach the point where another executive had to explain that Greenland was not their house?
And then there’s Trump
This is where the story gets tempting, and where we need to keep our hands on the wheel.
Donald Trump has spent years arguing that control of Greenland matters to the United States. He has spoken about the island in strategic terms, tied it to American national security and repeatedly refused to treat the idea of greater American control as some passing joke.
His Greenland envoy, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, has publicly talked about Greenland becoming part of the United States and has enthusiastically discussed its potential natural-resource wealth, including extraordinary oil production possibilities.
Then along comes an American oil venture saying there could be a fortune beneath Greenland.
Greenland Energy added Carol Craig to its board in June. Craig founded Sidus Space, which was selected as one of the contractors eligible for work under the Missile Defense Agency’s SHIELD contracting program. Sidus itself says SHIELD supports the broader Golden Dome missile-defense strategy. Trump himself has linked Greenland’s strategic importance to Golden Dome.
And because apparently reality had decided subtlety was overrated, Dr. Phil McGraw’s media company signed on to produce a documentary series about the Greenland Energy venture, selling the participants as Arctic wildcatters.
So, yes, we have reached the point where Donald Trump keeps talking about America needing Greenland, his envoy talks about Greenland producing huge amounts of oil, an American company is pursuing oil exploration there, and people in Trump’s broader political and defense orbit keep turning up around the venture. Then there’s Dr. Phil, making the fucking documentary.
You’re allowed to notice all of that, but you are not allowed to turn it into something the evidence does not show.
There is no evidence Trump ordered this project, that the White House coordinated it, that Landry arranged the deal, that Carol Craig brought Golden Dome into the oil operation, or that Dr. Phil is filming propaganda for some secret annexation plan.
Company leadership denies that the project is connected to any American effort to take control of Greenland. Put that denial on the record, then look at what actually is on the record.
The problem doesn’t require a conspiracy. It’s an atmosphere in which American political ambition, commercial enthusiasm and media spectacle can all begin talking about Greenland’s future before Greenland itself has said yes.
And Greenland still hasn’t said yes
That became even clearer on August 9, when it turned out the drilling approval process is nowhere near finished.
Greenland has laid out an extensive process involving project documentation, environmental review, social-impact assessment and public consultation. According to the government’s current project status, the proposed drilling program is effectively at the beginning of that process.
Danwatch asked Jørgen Hammeken-Holm, the head of Greenland’s Mineral Resources Department, whether the company could receive the necessary approvals in time to conduct its planned winter drilling program this year.
His answer was one word.
“No.”
That’s a fairly significant development when the companies involved have continued talking to investors about progress, momentum and schedules.
Greenland Energy’s August 6 shareholder communication said the project was advancing toward remaining approvals and described work continuing to keep the program on schedule. Three days later, the government department responsible for those approvals said the drilling cannot happen this year.
There’s also a much larger equipment shipment in the company’s planning: hundreds of containers and a drilling rig expected to come from Canada. Greenland’s mineral authorities say the required permission to land that equipment hasn’t been obtained either.
Hammeken-Holm was asked what would happen if the company simply sailed it over anyway. His answer, essentially: sail all you want, but you’re not coming ashore.
And maybe that is where this entire episode finally becomes simple.
Greenland Energy can raise money, make deals, hire executives, move containers, prepare equipment and shoot television. Donald Trump can keep talking about how much America needs Greenland. Jeff Landry can keep touting the oil. Investors can run their numbers on what a discovery might be worth, and Dr. Phil can point his cameras at the Arctic and call everybody wildcatters.
None of them gets the final say. Greenland does.
Somehow, that is the part everybody keeps having trouble remembering.
THE RECORD
White Flame Energy holds the underlying Jameson Land exploration licenses. Greenland Energy has a contractual path to earn up to a 70% working interest by funding and completing the first two exploration wells. Any transfer of the license interests requires Greenlandic government consent.
Greenland stopped issuing new oil licenses in 2021, but these older licenses remained valid.
The earlier landing authorization expired in December 2025. A new approval was still pending when equipment was moved to Nerlerit Inaat.
Greenland issued a strong warning after the July equipment movement and said future logistics requiring approval must be authorized in advance.
Exploratory drilling has not begun.
Greenland’s mineral-resources department says the project will not receive the approvals needed to drill in 2026.
There is no evidence Donald Trump directed, coordinated or secretly backed the Greenland Energy project.
BULLSHIT DETECTOR
Claim: Greenland Energy already has the approvals it needs to proceed with drilling.
Verdict: BULLSHIT.
The underlying exploration licenses exist, but the current drilling program requires additional approvals that have not been granted. Greenland’s own government says the project remains near the beginning of the approval process and cannot receive the necessary drilling permissions this year.
That isn’t an interpretation. That’s the regulator.
THE BULLSHIT DETECTOR
Politics produces an industrial quantity of claims every day. The Bullshit Detector exists for the ones that deserve more than a shrug. All subscribers get a free copy. It is also available for $4.95 through the Tom Hicks Media Store.
No talking points. No team jerseys. Just the claim, the evidence, and the verdict.
ALSO FROM TOM HICKS MEDIA
Panic Room Sports separates actual sports news from whatever everyone has decided to lose their minds about before lunch.
Tom’s Number Ones goes back through the charts one day at a time, with the songs, the history and the receipts. You can also play along with musical games.
Lotus Purrspective remains convinced the rest of us are badly managed.
BUY ME A CUP OF TEA
Independent publishing costs money even when the writer stubbornly insists on doing most of the work himself.
If Off Script gives you something worth reading, you can help keep it going with a cup of tea.
ONE QUESTION BEFORE YOU GO
Where do you think preparation ends and disrespect for another country’s sovereignty begins?
ONE LAST THING
There’s a sentence buried in this story that ought to be insultingly obvious: Greenland is not their house.
The fact that someone inside the project had to say it out loud tells you why this story matters more than a stack of permit forms ever could.
THANKS FOR READING OFF SCRIPT.
I appreciate you spending part of your day with me.
#OffScriptWithTomHicks #Greenland #GreenlandEnergy #JamesonLand #DonaldTrump #OilExploration #Arctic #USPolitics #IndependentJournalism #TomHicksMedia