Trump Was Never a Republican
He didn’t switch parties. He made them irrelevant.
By Tom Hicks | The Unredacted Bastard Independent Journalist • Democracy’s Fire Alarm • Professional Shit-Stirrer
Bastard’s Law
When power organizes around a person instead of rules, the rules don’t disappear. They just stop protecting you.
Trump has been the same guy for forty years.
Democrat. Republican. Outsider. Savior. Victim. Whatever label got him closer to what he wanted that morning. Not a conversion. Not an evolution. A business model -- one that only works as long as people keep mistaking it for politics.
And they do.
Because admitting what it actually is means admitting the whole thing is a one-man hustle. And nobody wants to be the person who got taken by a one-man hustle.
So they keep trying to fit him into a system he never gave a shit about. They argue about whether he’s a real conservative, whether the party can be saved, and whether this is fascism or just really aggressive branding. Meanwhile, he’s not having that argument at all. He solved it already. The party isn’t the engine.
He is.
Normal politics, even the messy, cynical, backroom-dealing kind, still pretends to run on shared rules. Platforms. Coalitions. A thin layer of consistency that at least gestures at something beyond the guy currently holding the microphone.
Trumpism burns that layer off.
What replaces it is loyalty. Not to an idea. Not to a platform. To a person who decides what the rules are on a rolling basis, and whose only consistent principle across forty years of public life is that he comes first. Today’s conviction is whatever helps him today. Tomorrow’s is whatever keeps him out of trouble tomorrow. The rest of you can figure out where that leaves you.
“The loyalty is to the leader, not to the institutions.” — Political scientist Juan Linz, on the architecture of personalist rule
That’s not a warning anymore. That’s the operating manual.
Which is why the contradictions don’t register as contradictions. There’s no inconsistency if the only standard is self-interest. Policy flips, facts bend, allies become enemies overnight -- none of that is a bug. It’s load-bearing. The chaos is the point. It keeps everyone off-balance and looking to him for the next signal instead of asking why the fuck the signal keeps changing.
The only thing that actually isn’t fine is stepping out of line.
Do that, and you find out fast that disagreement and betrayal are the same word now. People who were “great” last Tuesday are suddenly weak, corrupt, disloyal -- not because anything changed, not because new information arrived, but because their usefulness did. That’s it. That’s the whole system.
And once usefulness is the standard, accountability doesn’t get weaker.
It gets optional.
If you’re not subscribed yet, you’re reading this the hard way. Fix that.
Here’s the part that should bother you more than it probably does.
This isn’t just Trump being an egotistical asshole. We’ve had those. They come through, they wreck some things, they leave. What’s different here -- what’s actually fucking different -- is what happens when an entire political structure decides it’s easier to reorganize around that kind of person than to push back on him.
Lawmakers adjust. Messaging shifts. Standards get quietly lowered through the floor. Not in one big dramatic moment that shows up on the front page. In a hundred smaller decisions, each one defensible in isolation, each one explainable if you don’t zoom out.
Until you do zoom out.
And the system didn’t hold. It adapted.
You want to know what that adaptation looks like in practice? Not in theory, not in a think piece -- in actual practice, with actual people whose actual lives just got shredded?
The Trump administration revoked the green cards of relatives of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani and had ICE detain them for deportation.
Take a breath. I know what you’re thinking. Nobody’s defending Soleimani here -- the man was an enemy of the United States, full stop. That’s not the argument. Stop making it the argument.
The argument is what had to happen under the hood for this to go down.
Legal residency, something that is supposed to come with defined rights, a defined process, and defined protections, has been converted into something that can be yanked based on association. Not a conviction. Not a court. Not even a formal finding. A call. Someone decided these people were the right target at the right moment, and legal status that was supposed to mean something just... didn’t.
“The risk is not a single abuse, but the normalization of discretion without constraint.” — Legal scholar Aziz Huq, on what executive overreach actually looks like when it’s working
Normalization of discretion without constraint.
Sit with that for a goddamn second.
Because if your legal status can be undone because of who you’re related to, or what someone thinks you believe, or because you became useful as an example -- then it was never really legal status.
It was permission.
And permission is exactly as durable as your usefulness to whoever’s granting it.
Power doesn’t come out swinging at full force. It never does. It probes. It looks for edges. It starts with the cases that are easiest to justify because the target isn’t sympathetic, and it watches to see what the hell happens next.
You’re not supposed to feel bad for these people. That’s part of the design. Lower the resistance, make the mechanism easier to accept, and most people won’t look too hard at the mechanism itself.
But the question was never whether they deserve it.
The question is what just changed. What standard just moved? What protection just got quietly hollowed out? What precedent got set in a case most people scrolled past on their way to something more comfortable?
Because once the rules bend for the right target, they’re already bent. And the next target doesn’t need to be nearly as convenient.
That’s the thing about permission replacing rights. Rights have edges. Rights have definitions. Rights push back.
Permission just... doesn’t.
Trump didn’t take over a party. He turned power into something personal, and he did it in plain sight while people argued about whether he was really a Republican. And once that happens, once the rules only matter when they’re useful to the person holding them, the question isn’t what the rules are anymore.
It’s who they apply to.
You think you know the answer to that. You think it’s obvious. You think the answer is “not me.”
That’s what everyone thinks…Right up until it isn’t theoretical anymore.
I’m retired, reader-funded, and not taking a dime from sponsors, which means this stays blunt, independent, and exactly as unfiltered as it needs to be.
Want the deeper breakdowns? The War Room pieces? The stuff that doesn’t make it into the public feed? Hit upgrade and get inside.
For a cooler, sharper, and considerably more judgmental take on the human condition, delivered by someone with four paws, zero tolerance for nonsense, and a vocabulary that puts most op-ed writers to shame, check out Lotus Purrspective.
If this hit home, like it, share it, subscribe.
☕ Buy Me A Coffee — if this saved you from one more political sales pitch, fuel the next one.
#Trumpism #ICE #CivilRights #ExecutivePower #Democracy #Politics