By Tom Hicks | September 17, 2026

Editorial Note

House Speaker Mike Johnson says canceling Thursday’s votes and sending members home early had nothing to do with Rep. Thomas Massie’s attempt to force a vote on impeaching Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Maybe that’s exactly what happened. But this isn’t the first time Johnson has discovered that an inconvenient House vote becomes considerably less inconvenient when there isn’t a House around to vote on it. At some point, coincidence starts asking an awful lot of us.

Your subscription helps fund reporting, research, publishing, new features, and the continued growth of every Tom Hicks Media publication.

Subscribe now

The vote that suddenly wasn’t happening

Rep. Thomas Massie dropped something unpleasant into Republican leadership’s lap Tuesday: eight articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Massie accused Hegseth of violating congressional war powers during the war with Iran and alleged additional abuses involving military strikes on suspected drug-trafficking vessels, the investigation of Sen. Mark Kelly, operations in Yemen and the seizure of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. The Pentagon has defended Hegseth’s leadership. (washingtonpost.com)

Massie didn’t merely introduce the resolution and hope somebody noticed. By making it privileged, he started a procedural clock that required the House to deal with it within two legislative days. Johnson acknowledged Wednesday that a vote would have to happen and predicted it would fail. Thursday, conveniently enough, was day two. (news.bloomberglaw.com)

Except Thursday disappeared.

Republican leadership canceled the session Wednesday, sending members home until November 9, six days after the midterm elections. This wasn’t exactly a Congress suffering from an overwork problem to begin with. Leadership had already erased two other weeks from the September calendar, and now the final scheduled voting day before Election Day was gone too. (washingtonpost.com)

Johnson insists Hegseth had nothing to do with it. He called Massie’s impeachment resolution a stunt, praised Hegseth and said members had completed their work and needed to get home to make their case to voters. He also acknowledged that the Hegseth matter would probably be handled when the House returns, which means whatever vote eventually happens will happen after those voters have already cast their ballots. (washingtonpost.com)

That’s entirely possible.

It’s also one hell of a coincidence.

There’s an old rule about situations like this. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, eventually somebody is going to ask why Mike Johnson is standing there holding a fucking duck.

Massie apparently knows his ducks

The story gets considerably more interesting when you find out Massie apparently expected something like this to happen. He reportedly kept his Hegseth impeachment plan secret from Republican leadership because he worried leadership might screw around with the House schedule if Johnson knew what was coming. According to Axios, Massie’s concern came partly from his previous fight with Johnson over the Jeffrey Epstein files. (axios.com)

That’s a strange place for Congress to find itself. A Republican member wanted to use an established House procedure to force his colleagues onto the record, yet he was sufficiently concerned about the Speaker’s response that he concealed the resolution from his own party’s leadership until he introduced it Tuesday. On Wednesday, leadership changed the schedule and eliminated the legislative day that would have forced the issue before the election.

Does that prove Johnson canceled Thursday specifically to protect Hegseth or Republicans who didn’t want to cast that vote? No. Johnson denies it, and unless somebody produces evidence of his intent, we don’t get to crawl inside his head and declare otherwise.

Fortunately, we don’t need to.

We can look at the calendar. We can look at what the decision accomplished. And we can look backward, because this particular duck has been waddling around Capitol Hill for a while.

The Epstein disappearing act

Go back to July 2025. Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna were pushing for the release of government records involving Jeffrey Epstein while Democrats used floor procedure to force Republicans into uncomfortable votes on the issue. Johnson initially said the House would continue working through Thursday before beginning its August recess. (axios.com)

Then the Epstein fight jammed up the House Rules Committee. Republican leaders changed the schedule, Thursday’s votes disappeared and members headed home a day early for a five-week recess, leaving scheduled legislation behind. Johnson said Republicans were finished with what he described as Democratic political games surrounding Epstein. (rollcall.com)

Maybe you agree with him. Maybe the whole thing was political theater. Congress has certainly never suffered from a shortage of that.

It doesn’t change what happened next. Once the House stopped voting, Republicans no longer had to take the Epstein-related votes leadership was trying to avoid. Nobody had to win those votes because nobody had to cast them.

That trick would come in handy again.

Before Epstein, there were babies

A few months earlier, Johnson had run into trouble from another member of his own conference. Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna joined Democratic Rep. Brittany Pettersen in pushing a proposal allowing members who were new parents to vote by proxy for up to 12 weeks. Their discharge petition gathered the 218 signatures necessary to circumvent leadership and force the issue toward the House floor.

Johnson opposed the proposal. Leadership tried to block it through a procedural rule, but nine Republicans joined Democrats and defeated the maneuver 222-206. Suddenly Johnson had a rebellion inside his own conference and a House floor he could no longer reliably control.

His response was remarkably simple.

He canceled the rest of the week’s House session.

“We’ll regroup,” Johnson said, and members went home. (apnews.com)

Nobody was talking about Pete Hegseth. Nobody was talking about Jeffrey Epstein. The issue involved new parents serving in Congress, which is about as far removed from either of those fights as you can get. What remained the same was the problem facing Johnson: a floor fight he didn’t want, rank-and-file members successfully going around leadership, and a House calendar that became shorter when he lost control of what was going to happen on the floor.

Then Epstein came back

Sending everybody home in July didn’t make the Epstein fight disappear permanently. By September 2025, Massie’s discharge petition was approaching the 218 signatures required to force a vote, and Democrat Adelita Grijalva won a special election in Arizona. She was expected to provide the decisive signature.

There was a catch. Grijalva couldn’t sign anything until she was sworn into Congress.

Johnson kept the House out during the government shutdown and said she would be sworn in when the chamber returned. He rejected accusations that the extended absence was intended to delay the Epstein petition as “totally absurd.” Critics pointed out that previously elected Republican members had been sworn in while the House was out of session. (axios.com)

Grijalva finally took office on November 12, nearly two months after winning her election. She immediately signed Massie’s petition.

Number 218.

The signature that forced the issue forward had spent weeks sitting outside Congress attached to a duly elected member who hadn’t been sworn in yet. (rollcall.com)

Again, Johnson disputed the accusation that the delay was about Epstein. Again, we don’t have to pretend we know his private motive. The interesting part is what the scheduling decision accomplished: while the House stayed away, the petition couldn’t get the signature everyone knew Grijalva intended to provide.

That starts looking less like an isolated parliamentary oddity and more like something worth paying attention to.

The Speaker controls more than the gavel

Most Americans understandably think congressional power is exercised through votes. A bill comes up, members vote yes or no, somebody wins and somebody loses. That’s the part C-SPAN shows us, and it’s the part that ends up in campaign ads.

A tremendous amount of power is exercised before anybody pushes a button. Leadership influences what reaches the floor, when it reaches the floor and, rather importantly, whether there’s a floor full of members available to vote on it in the first place.

That’s why discharge petitions and privileged resolutions matter. They’re among the tools rank-and-file members can use when leadership would prefer that something never reach a vote. Massie’s Hegseth resolution created precisely that situation because its privileged status started a clock Johnson couldn’t stop simply by sticking the resolution in a drawer.

But there is another way to stop a legislative clock.

Stop having legislative days.

Nothing about that is inherently illegal or even particularly mysterious. The Speaker has enormous influence over the House schedule, and congressional leaders from both parties have used procedural power to protect their agendas and manage difficult votes for generations.

The question is what happens when that power starts colliding with accountability.

The vote didn’t have to be close

Hegseth probably wasn’t going to be impeached. Johnson predicted Massie’s resolution would fail, and nothing in the available reporting suggests Massie had assembled anything approaching the votes necessary to impeach the defense secretary.

That’s almost beside the point.

A failed vote still forces every member to choose. Massie’s resolution would have put Republicans on the record regarding a defense secretary whose conduct of the Iran war has become politically contentious only weeks before an election. NBC News reported that some vulnerable Republicans have been uneasy with Hegseth’s leadership during the war. (nbclosangeles.com)

And names have consequences. They appear in campaign ads, show up in mailboxes and give reporters back home a very simple question to ask: Why did you vote that way?

Move the vote from before Election Day to after Election Day and none of those things can happen while voters are deciding whether to send those members back to Washington. Whatever Johnson’s reason for canceling Thursday, that’s the practical effect.

Which makes the timing awfully damned convenient.

Congress has a calendar problem

There’s nothing scandalous about Congress recessing before an election. Members campaign, spend time in their districts, and try to convince voters that Washington would collapse without them. Congressional calendars have bent around elections forever.

But context matters, and this context is getting difficult to ignore. Republican leadership had already canceled two scheduled September session weeks before Wednesday’s announcement. Thursday was supposed to be the final voting day before November, and Massie introduced a resolution Tuesday that required action within two legislative days.

By Wednesday morning, Thursday had stopped being a legislative day.

Those are the facts. Johnson says members had finished their work. Massie says leadership wanted to avoid his vote. We know what each man claims, we know what the calendar shows, and readers are perfectly capable of deciding what they think about the rest.

What shouldn’t disappear in that argument is the broader pattern. Johnson has now repeatedly found himself facing House floor action he didn’t want, only for the schedule itself to become part of the solution. Sometimes the House leaves early. Sometimes it stays away. This time, a legislative day vanished while a privileged resolution was ticking toward a vote.

Eventually the question becomes bigger than why Johnson made any one of those decisions. How much accountability can a Speaker avoid simply by controlling when accountability is allowed to happen?

You can’t vote if nobody’s there

That’s the part that bothers me more than Pete Hegseth.

Congressional democracy doesn’t require every member to vote the way I want. It requires representatives to make their own decisions, put those decisions on the record, and answer to the people who sent them there. If Republicans believe Massie’s impeachment resolution is ridiculous, vote against it. If Democrats believe Hegseth should be impeached, vote for it. If somebody thinks both sides are full of shit, there’s probably a bar stool available next to mine.

But everybody should still have to vote.

Johnson didn’t invent congressional scheduling games, and pretending he did would weaken the argument. Speakers from both parties have used calendars, rules and recesses to manage their caucuses and protect political interests. The reason Johnson deserves scrutiny isn’t that he possesses those powers. It’s how often ending or delaying House business has produced a convenient escape hatch when his control of the floor was threatened, or his members faced a vote leadership didn’t want.

Proxy voting gets troublesome, and the House goes home. Epstein gets troublesome, and the House goes home early. The Epstein petition comes back, and the House stays away while its decisive signature waits to be sworn in.

Then Thomas Massie walks into Congress on Tuesday carrying eight articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth and a procedural clock that could force everybody onto the record before the midterms.

By Wednesday, Thursday’s voting session is gone.

Johnson says the two things have nothing to do with each other. We don’t have evidence proving otherwise.

Maybe he’s right.

But somewhere in Washington, that duck is quacking its ass off.

From Off Script: The Bullshit Detector

The claim:

A viral image proves Donald Trump was photographed kissing White House aide Natalie Harp on a golf course.

Bullshit.

The sharp, widely circulated version isn’t an authentic photograph. Fact-checkers found an AI watermark and an obvious extra finger, while the White House called the image fake. There is a blurry version whose origin is less certain, so the evidence doesn’t establish that Trump and Harp were actually photographed kissing at all. Treating an AI-generated image as proof of something that happened in the real world is exactly how bullshit becomes “everybody knows.” (thedailybeast.com)

The claim:

A Dominion Voting Systems whistleblower exposed politicians taking millions of dollars in bribes to rig the 2026 midterms.

Bullshit.

There’s no credible evidence of the supposed whistleblower or of politicians receiving millions in bribes from Dominion, whose assets were acquired and renamed Liberty Vote. The story is part of the familiar election-conspiracy machinery: invent an insider, attach a frightening number to the allegation, and let social media do the rest. NewsGuard included the claim in its tracker of false narratives circulating ahead of the 2026 midterms. (newsguardrealitycheck.com)

The claim:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says the Trump administration reversed a “30-year decline” in American life expectancy.

Bullshit.

There wasn’t a 30-year decline to reverse. U.S. life expectancy rose from 75.4 years in 1990 to 78.8 in 2019, dropped sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently rebounded, reaching 79 years in 2024. You can take credit for improving a number if you’ve got the evidence, but first you don’t get to invent three decades of decline that never happened. (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

The claim:

Donald Trump posted a Truth Social message attacking Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese after Albanese interrupted Trump’s golf game.

Bullshit.

The viral screenshot is fabricated. Searches of Trump’s account and available archives found no such post, and the supposed screenshot is missing normal Truth Social interface elements. It even refers to former Australian ambassador Kevin Rudd as though he still held the job. Trump has posted plenty of extraordinary things all by himself. There’s really no need to write new ones for him. (prod-ss.aap.com.au)

More From Tom Hicks Media

Lotus Purrspective offers daily life, household politics and occasional human-management advice from a tuxedo cat who remains absolutely certain she’s in charge.

Tom’s Number Ones goes back through the charts one date at a time, with six No. 1 songs and whatever musical weirdness history left behind.

Panic Room Sports brings smart football coverage with attitude, including fantasy football, injuries, waiver moves and the occasional roster decision that should require adult supervision.

Rabbit Ears Classic TV goes back to the shows, stars, and strange little pieces of television history that never quite left us.

The Backlot Ghost wanders through movie history looking for the stories that happened behind the camera.

Buy Me a Cup of Tea

Independent publishing takes research, time, and an unreasonable amount of tea. If you enjoy the work and want to help keep it going, you can buy me a cup.

One Question Before You Go

When congressional leaders don’t want a vote before an election, should they be allowed to make the vote disappear simply by sending everyone home?

#MikeJohnson #PeteHegseth #ThomasMassie #Congress #HouseOfRepresentatives #Accountability #OffScript #IndependentJournalism #USPolitics

WHEN THE VOTE GETS TOUGH, MIKE JOHNSON GOES…